U.S. equity markets declined sharply on Monday, February 23, after President Donald Trump announced he would push ahead with a broad 15% tariff on imports from all countries, defying a U.S. Supreme Court ruling issued the prior Friday that found he had overstepped his legal authority by invoking emergency powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose sweeping trade levies. The Dow Jones Industrial Average tumbled 1.6% by the close, while the S&P 500 fell 1.4% and the Nasdaq 100 declined 1.1%, following earlier losses across European stock markets. Trump, posting on his Truth Social platform, warned that any country seeking to renegotiate trade agreements in light of the court decision would face tariffs in a "much more powerful and obnoxious way," escalating fears of renewed trade war confrontations ahead of the November midterm elections.​

The market reaction underscores the degree to which trade policy uncertainty has become a structural risk for equity investors. A YouGov poll conducted immediately after the Supreme Court ruling found that approximately 60% of Americans supported the court's decision to strike down the tariff regime, including 88% of Democrats, 63% of independents, and 30% of Republicans. A separate Fox News poll showed 63% of registered voters disapproved of Trump's tariff approach, compared to just 37% who approved. For investors, the core concern is not simply the tariff rate itself but the unpredictability of its legal and political footing, which complicates supply chain planning, earnings forecasting, and capital allocation across multinational companies with significant U.S. import exposure. Sectors with deep international supply chains, including consumer electronics, automotive, and retail, remain most vulnerable to sustained policy whipsaw.

A speculative but widely circulated research note published on Substack by Citrini Research, a U.S. firm focused on economic megatrends, rattled equity markets on Tuesday, February 24, triggering a selloff in companies deemed most vulnerable to autonomous AI agents. The S&P 500 dropped more than 1% on the day, and the index's software component fell to its lowest level since President Trump's April 2025 "liberation day" tariff announcement. Shares of Uber, American Express, Mastercard, and DoorDash, all specifically named in the Citrini scenario as firms whose business models could be undermined by AI agents, lost between 4% and 6% in trading. The Citrini report described a scenario, explicitly labeled as speculative and not a prediction, in which autonomous AI systems eliminate economic friction, render traditional payment intermediaries obsolete, and contribute to U.S. unemployment exceeding 10% by June 2028, ultimately wiping out 57% of the S&P 500 in a late-2027 crash.​

The report's outsized market impact drew commentary from analysts who noted that its reception reflects a broader anxiety that has been building on Wall Street since early February. Neil Wilson, an analyst at Saxo Capital Markets, described the Citrini piece as "doomsday porn" that nonetheless served as "a bit of a wake-up call that the economy already no longer resembles the one just a few years ago." Stephen Innes, managing partner at SPI Asset Management, observed that markets had absorbed wars, sticky inflation, banking stresses, and tariff disruptions with relative composure, yet a single Substack post proved capable of knocking them sideways. For investors, the episode reinforces the fragility of high-multiple, asset-light business models in an environment where AI product launches can instantly reprice entire sectors. Companies operating as consumer-facing intermediaries, in ride-sharing, payments, delivery, and financial services, now carry elevated headline risk regardless of their near-term fundamentals.

The yield on the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury note fell below 4.02% on Thursday, February 26, reaching its lowest level since November 26, 2025, according to Dow Jones Market Data. Simultaneously, the 30-year Treasury bond yield dropped below 4.7%, also hitting a three-month low at the 3 p.m. Eastern close. The moves occurred in the absence of any significant macroeconomic data releases or geopolitical developments that would traditionally explain a rally of this magnitude in the bond market. Lawrence Gillum, a strategist at LPL Financial, attributed part of the Treasury market's sustained bid to what he described as an ongoing AI fear trade, with investors rotating into government bonds as a hedge against the potential for AI-driven mass white-collar unemployment to suppress consumer spending and economic growth.​

The implications for investors are multifaceted and increasingly significant. Lower Treasury yields, if sustained, would reduce mortgage rates tied to the 10-year note, potentially providing modest relief to the housing market. However, Gillum noted that traders appear focused on AI's disinflationary impact rather than the inflationary pressures that have delayed Federal Reserve rate cuts, with markets now pricing the next Fed reduction as far out as July 2026. The disconnect between falling long-term yields and a still-resilient labor market, where most companies have maintained a "low-hire, low-fire" posture, adds complexity to the bond market's signal. For equity investors, a falling 10-year yield often signals recession concerns rather than positive macro momentum, and the current dynamic suggests that bond markets are beginning to price in a longer-term structural risk from AI disruption rather than a near-term cyclical slowdown.

Initial claims for state unemployment benefits rose by 4,000 to a seasonally adjusted 212,000 for the week ending February 21, the U.S. Labor Department reported on Thursday, February 26. The reading came in below the 215,000 forecast from economists surveyed by Reuters and remained well below historical averages from the prior two years. Continuing claims, which serve as a proxy for the stock of ongoing unemployment, fell by 31,000 to a seasonally adjusted 1.833 million for the week ending February 14, one of the lowest readings in the past 10 months. The continuing claims figure is particularly relevant because that week coincides with the reference period for the Bureau of Labor Statistics' household survey, suggesting the February unemployment rate is likely to hold steady.

For investors, the jobless claims data reinforces the narrative that the U.S. labor market, while not accelerating, has not yet cracked under the combined weight of tariff-driven uncertainty and AI disruption anxieties. The resilience of employment data complicates the case for near-term Federal Reserve rate cuts, as policymakers led by Chair Jerome Powell have consistently signaled they require meaningful softening in labor conditions before easing monetary policy further. The 212,000 initial claims reading sits comfortably within the range associated with healthy labor market conditions, but market participants are watching closely for any upward trend that would confirm that AI-related layoffs or trade-war-driven cutbacks are beginning to materialize in the payrolls data. The February jobs report, scheduled for release in early March, will be the next critical data point to validate or challenge the prevailing assessment of labor market stability.

Samsung Electronics officially launched its flagship Galaxy S26 smartphone lineup at its Galaxy Unpacked 2026 event on February 26, raising prices on select models in key markets as the company contends with soaring memory chip costs driven by global AI infrastructure buildout. In the United States, the base Galaxy S26 is priced at $899, a 4.7% increase over its predecessor, while the S26 Plus climbs 10% to $1,099. The Ultra model's price remained unchanged. In South Korea, the base model carries an 8.6% price increase. Samsung attributed the pricing adjustments to intensifying pressure from memory chip shortages, which have been exacerbated by massive procurement by companies including Meta, Google, and Microsoft as they race to build out AI data center capacity. Market research firm TrendForce forecasts conventional DRAM contract prices to surge 90% to 95% in the first quarter of 2026 compared to the fourth quarter of 2025. Samsung also disclosed that some S26 variants will use its in-house Exynos processors rather than Qualcomm Snapdragon chips, a strategic shift analysts say could improve its chip design business and mobile profit margins.

The Galaxy S26 launch carries meaningful implications for the broader technology investment landscape. The pricing pressure Samsung faces is not unique. In January, Apple CEO Tim Cook acknowledged expectations for significantly higher memory chip costs but declined to say whether Apple would adjust iPhone prices in response, a question investors have been pressing with increasing urgency. The DRAM shortage reflects a zero-sum dynamic in the semiconductor supply chain: as hyperscalers and AI developers consume a growing share of high-bandwidth memory output, consumer electronics manufacturers are forced to pay sharply elevated rates for remaining supply or accept compressed margins. For investors holding positions in consumer electronics companies, semiconductor suppliers such as SK Hynix and Micron, or AI infrastructure enablers like Nvidia, the memory crunch represents both a cost headwind for device makers and a potential tailwind for chip producers with exposure to data center demand. Samsung's rollout of the S26 series is scheduled to begin on March 11.

Financial Trends: FY2026 net sales are projected at about $4.787B with EBITDA margin around 26% as revenue growth moderates versus prior years.​

Strategic Initiatives: The core strategy remains driving Falcon platform consolidation and expanding module adoption to lift ARR and sustain net-new customer spend.​

Key Metrics: Investors typically key on ARR level and growth, net-new ARR, and FCF/FCF margin as the clearest read-through to durable demand and efficiency.

Progress: Street models imply continued scale benefits with FY2026 EBITDA projected near $1.25B and FY2026 FCF near $1.196B, reinforcing the “rule-of-40+” narrative if growth holds.​

Focus Areas: On the call, watch commentary on ARR momentum and whether demand remains resilient enough to support FY2026 revenue trajectory into FY2027.

Risks Potential: A sharper-than-expected security spend slowdown or elongated deal cycles could pressure ARR growth and force more conservative forward commentary.​

Concerns: Any sign FY2026 growth is decelerating faster than the ~21% revenue growth embedded in consensus models may reset expectations given the premium valuation.​

Market Trends: Endpoint and cloud security remain secular growth areas, but buyers are increasingly emphasizing consolidation and ROI, raising the bar for clear platform-driven expansion signals.​

Financial Trends: Heading into the print, Broadcom guided Q1 FY26 revenue of about $19.1B with adjusted EBITDA around 67%, keeping the focus on margin durability at higher scale.​

Strategic Initiatives: Management is leaning into AI infrastructure (custom silicon/networking) while integrating VMware to expand software mix and recurring revenue.​

Key Metrics: Key investor gauges are AI-related semiconductor revenue trajectory, software (VMware) bookings/renewals trends, and consolidated EBITDA margin.​

Progress: The company’s Q1 FY26 outlook itself signals continued strong top-line growth and very high profitability, so beats may matter less than raise/hold and mix commentary.
​
Focus Areas: Listen for updates on AI demand visibility, supply constraints, and VMware execution (including cross-sell and customer retention).​

Risks Potential: AI spending volatility, hyperscaler digestion, or enterprise optimization could hit near-term revenue and compress valuation multiples.​

Concerns: With expectations already for near-30% YoY quarterly revenue growth, any softness in guidance cadence could trigger an outsized reaction.​

Market Trends: Semiconductor sentiment is being driven by AI capex cycles and networking buildouts, making Broadcom’s AI commentary a sector read-through.​

Financial Trends: FY2026 net sales are projected around $297.206B with EPS about $20.32, reflecting steady high-single-digit sales growth and modest earnings leverage.​

Strategic Initiatives: Costco continues to invest in warehouse growth and member value (pricing, private label, and traffic-driving merchandising) to support renewal strength.​

Key Metrics: Investors focus on comp sales, membership fee income/renewal rates, and margin drivers like merchandise gross margin and shrink.​

Progress: Consensus models embed improving profitability with FY2026 net income projected near $9.033B and modest net margin expansion toward ~3.0%.​

Focus Areas: Watch for commentary on pricing actions, wage/benefit cost pressures, and how management is balancing value perception versus margin.​

Risks Potential: Margin compression from intensifying price competition, higher freight/labor costs, or a slowdown in discretionary categories could weigh on the print.​

Concerns: Given the stock’s high valuation, any deceleration in comps or a cautious tone on consumer demand could dominate the post-earnings reaction.​

Market Trends: The backdrop remains a value-seeking consumer and heightened grocery/club competition, so Costco’s traffic and renewal commentary can swing retail sentiment.​

From a young age, Evan was fascinated by the stock market. At just 11 years old, he received a Wall Street Journal subscription for his birthday, sparking a lifelong passion for investing. Evan spent his formative years studying the strategies and philosophies of legendary investors like Paul Tudor Jones, Stanley Druckenmiller, and George Soros, absorbing their wisdom and developing his own unique approach to the markets.

As Evan's knowledge grew, he began to incorporate the time-tested, technically-based strategies of trading legends like William O'Neil and Richard Wyckoff into his own investment framework. By borrowing elements from each and rigorously testing them in real-time, Evan created a powerful conglomerate strategy that encompasses fundamentals, technicals, and macroeconomics.

Today, Evan is a professional trader and was a top contender in the 2020 US Investing Championship. His extraordinary performance, with a 141.8% return, is a testament to his studious background, well-informed approach, and unwavering dedication to his craft.

At the core of Evan's strategy is identifying stocks that benefit from sector trends and rotation. By combining fundamental analysis with a focus on relative strength and advanced technical analysis techniques, Evan is able to identify the stocks that are most likely to move higher or lower over the intermediate term.

While he keeps a close eye on macroeconomic trends, his willingness to adapt to changing market conditions, as well as his developed ability to know when to and not to act in a fast-moving market, is what sets him apart. Evan has consistently demonstrated his ability to navigate even the most challenging investment environments. His impressive track record and unique perspective make him a valuable voice in the world of finance, and he is thrilled to have the opportunity to share his insights and expertise with subscribers of the Bull and Bear Brief.