Market’s Week in Review

May 19 - May 25, 2026
Short-Term ETF Price Targets
ETF | Short-Term Target |
|---|---|
SPY | $742 |
QQQ | $720 |
Week’s Market Performance
Index | Current Level | Percent Change: Week | Percent Change: Year-to-Date |
|---|---|---|---|
S&P 500 | 7357.49 | -0.25% | 7.48% |
NASDAQ 100 | 29,440.32 | +0.41% | 16.60% |
VIX | 18.91 | +9.78% | 25.82% |
10-Year Treasury Yield | 4.172% | -0.46% | 0.00% |
Gold | 4.026.77 | -2.85% | -6.78% |
Oil | 72.05 | +14.88% | 25.43% |
Market News
Micron Technology Delivers Blowout Earnings as AI Memory Demand Reshapes the Semiconductor Landscape
Micron Technology reported fiscal third-quarter results on June 24 that dramatically exceeded Wall Street expectations, sending shares surging more than 16% on June 25. Revenue came in at $41.46 billion, more than quadrupling from $9.3 billion in the same quarter a year earlier and well ahead of the analyst consensus of approximately $36 billion. Net income reached $28.24 billion, or $24.46 per diluted share, compared to a loss of $1.9 billion in the year-ago period. Gross margins expanded to 84.9%, up from 74.4% in the prior quarter and roughly 39% a year ago. For the fiscal fourth quarter, Micron guided revenue of approximately $50 billion, compared to analyst estimates of $43.2 billion, and adjusted earnings per share of about $31, versus expectations of $25.31. CEO Sanjay Mehrotra stated that demand for DRAM and NAND memory "significantly" exceeds supply and will do so "beyond calendar 2027," adding that the company currently has "no line of sight as to when memory supply will be able to catch up with increasing demand.
The results carry broad implications for the entire AI infrastructure ecosystem. Micron has secured 16 long-term supply agreements with hyperscalers, automakers, and AI infrastructure companies, locking in sales for three to five years and locking in $22 billion in customer commitments. The report confirms that Big Tech's projected AI capital expenditure of more than $700 billion in 2026, up from $400 billion in 2025, is translating directly into semiconductor pricing power. Global chip stocks rallied from Seoul to Frankfurt in response. However, the same memory shortage that benefits Micron is a cost headwind for companies purchasing the chips, including Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet, and Meta Platforms, all of which declined on Thursday. Micron's shares are now up approximately 298% year to date, and the company has crossed a $1 trillion market capitalization, making its forward guidance one of the most closely watched data points for the broader AI trade.
Apple Shares Drop More Than 5 Percent as Memory Shortage Forces Mac and iPad Price Hikes
Apple Inc. raised prices on select MacBook and iPad models by $100 to $300 per unit on June 25, citing the global memory shortage that has pushed component costs to multi-year highs. The announcement triggered a decline of more than 5% in Apple's share price on that session, erasing nearly $200 billion in market capitalization in a single day and pulling the stock below $280 per share, back into the upper range of a prior consolidation zone between $275 and $280. iPhone prices were left unchanged for now, though analysts widely expect increases on at least some iPhone 18 models when the new lineup is introduced later this year. The price adjustments on Macs and iPads represent the first tangible pass-through of rising AI infrastructure costs to Apple's consumer product lineup, marking a notable shift in the company's historically disciplined pricing.
The broader significance for investors is the contrast Apple's decline presents against Micron's rally. While Micron added more than $100 billion in market capitalization on the same day, Apple's loss of nearly $200 billion underscores the asymmetric impact of the memory crunch across the technology sector. The Magnificent Seven collectively fell approximately 2% to a two-month low as markets absorbed the implication that AI-related cost pressures are now moving from capital expenditure budgets into consumer-facing products. The $275 to $280 price range has re-emerged as a technically critical threshold for Apple's stock: a sustained close above that zone would confirm the prior breakout, while a close below $275 would risk converting the May rally into a failed breakout, which could prompt institutional investors to reassess price targets across large-cap technology.
Federal Reserve Holds Rates Steady but Signals Possible Hike as Inflation Remains Above Target
The Federal Open Market Committee voted unanimously on June 17 to hold its benchmark federal funds rate within a range of 3.50% to 3.75%, a level that has been in place since the central bank cut rates by three-quarters of a percentage point in late 2025. The decision came alongside updated quarterly projections showing that nine of 19 policymakers now expect at least one rate increase before the end of 2026, a significant shift from the March dot plot, which had pointed toward a cut. The median funds rate projection for year-end now stands at approximately 3.8%, up from 3.4% in March. Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, presiding over his first major policy cycle as chair, simultaneously launched a sweeping review of the central bank's operational framework, covering its balance sheet, inflation targeting, communication strategy, and labor market data sourcing.
The revised projections reflect persistent inflation driven in part by supply disruptions stemming from the U.S.-Iran conflict. The FOMC's end-2026 inflation forecast was revised up to 3.6%, well above the Fed's 2% target, before it is expected to ease to 2.3% in 2027 once supply disruptions abate. Warsh's announcement removed a prior signal for one rate cut in 2026 and deferred reductions to 2027 and 2028. Following the meeting, CME Group's FedWatch tool showed traders beginning to price in a possible rate hike as early as October. For investors, the recalibration raises the cost of capital outlook for rate-sensitive sectors including real estate, utilities, and highly leveraged growth companies. It also adds a layer of uncertainty to equity valuations, particularly for technology stocks already trading at elevated multiples relative to historical norms.
SpaceX 25 Billion Dollar Bond Sale Draws Bubble Warning From Allianz Chief Investment Officer
SpaceX launched a $25 billion bond offering in the week of June 22, its first-ever entry into the investment-grade debt market, occurring just days after the company's record-breaking $86 billion initial public offering on June 12 that made CEO Elon Musk the world's first trillionaire. The bond deal, which attracted approximately $89 billion in investor demand according to reports, was structured primarily to refinance $17.5 billion in junk-rated debt from SpaceX's February merger with xAI into cheaper investment-grade notes. SpaceX priced the bonds at a spread of 1.1 to 1.75 percentage points over Treasuries, above the 0.93 percentage point average spread for similarly rated corporate peers, according to the Financial Times. The company also disclosed cash reserves of approximately $100.8 billion on its balance sheet.
The speed of the dual fundraise, a record IPO followed within days by a $25 billion bond sale, prompted Allianz Chief Investment Officer Ludovic Subran, who oversees roughly 800 billion euros in assets, to warn that markets may have entered bubble territory. Subran argued that companies are rushing to secure financing while equity prices and borrowing conditions remain unusually favorable, citing SpaceX's fundraising pace as emblematic of investor enthusiasm running at historically elevated levels. He drew a sharp distinction between equity investors who are buying future growth and bond investors who require predictable income. Analysts at Susquehanna assigned a Neutral rating on SPCX, while KeyBanc cautioned that much of SpaceX's expected growth may already be priced in. SPCX shares have fallen more than 30% from their post-IPO peak, and the company posted a $4.3 billion quarterly loss in the period prior to its listing, a financial profile that is drawing increasing scrutiny from institutional credit investors.
Cryptocurrency Market Cap Falls 54 Percent From October 2025 Peak Amid Macro and Geopolitical Headwinds
The total global cryptocurrency market capitalization has fallen from a record $4.3 trillion on October 6, 2025, to approximately $2.0 trillion as of late June 2026, a decline of roughly 54% over 261 days and a destruction of value equivalent to approximately $8.8 billion per day on average, according to analysis from The Kobeissi Letter. Bitcoin, which accounts for approximately 55% to 56% of total crypto market share by dominance, has traded well below its prior cycle highs. The drawdown has been driven by a confluence of factors including persistent U.S.-Iran geopolitical tensions that have elevated inflation expectations and complicated Federal Reserve rate policy, as well as selling pressure tied to Strategy's early June disclosure that it liquidated a portion of its Bitcoin holdings for the first time in years, a development that triggered cascading outflows from U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs and follow-on selling by institutional and retail.
The scale of the correction is drawing comparisons to prior crypto bear markets and raising questions about the asset class's resilience during periods of elevated real interest rates and geopolitical uncertainty. With the Federal Reserve now signaling a possible rate hike before year-end and the benchmark rate already holding in the 3.50% to 3.75% range, the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding digital assets has increased materially. For investors, the decline also coincides with a period in which SpaceX's market capitalization of roughly $2.1 trillion has drawn direct comparisons to the total crypto market cap of approximately $2.0 trillion to $2.15 trillion, underscoring how rapidly capital has rotated from speculative digital assets toward AI and space-economy equities. Institutional participants will be monitoring whether the $2.0 trillion total market cap level holds as technical support or gives way to further liquidations.
Major Earnings
Nike, Inc. (NKE) – June 30, 2026, After Market Close
Financial Trends: Analysts estimate NKE full-year FY2026 EPS near $1.50 on revenue of ~$46.3B, a sharp step-down from prior years, reflecting margin compression and continued top-line pressure throughout the turnaround cycle.
Strategic Initiatives: Nike is executing a wholesale-channel reset, rebalancing its direct-to-consumer mix, and leaning into performance and lifestyle product innovation to rebuild brand heat and drive demand recovery.
Key Metrics: Investors will focus on annual revenue trajectory, full-year gross margin, EPS guidance for FY2027, inventory levels, and regional revenue splits—particularly North America growth vs. ongoing China softness.
Progress: The turnaround has shown uneven progress—Q3 FY2026 beat EPS estimates by $0.06 and revenue was in line, but operating margin fell to 5.6% vs. 7% a year ago, and the stock is down ~28% year-to-date.
Focus Areas: Management and analysts will prioritize FY2027 guidance credibility, evidence of gross margin recovery, wholesale channel momentum, and whether China demand has stabilized.
Risks Potential: Key headwinds include ongoing tariff exposure, a weak China macro backdrop, competitive pressure from On and Hoka, and the risk that a CFO transition disrupts financial strategy continuity mid-turnaround.
Concerns: The Street is cautious that Q4 FY2026 consensus EPS of just $0.11 on ~$10.85B in revenue signals continued top-line deterioration and that FY2027 guidance may disappoint given macro uncertainty.
Market Trends: Athletic footwear and apparel peers are seeing bifurcated demand—premium performance brands gaining share while mid-market incumbents face pricing pressure—which will set the tone for how investors interpret Nike's recovery narrative.
Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) – June 30, 2026, After Market Close
Financial Trends: Annual FY2027 adjusted EPS guidance is set at ~$11.55 (midpoint), missing Street estimates by ~6.6%, as aluminum tariffs and softening Hispanic consumer demand weigh on both revenue and profitability.
Strategic Initiatives: Constellation is focused on sustaining the Modelo franchise, defending Modelo Especial's #1 U.S. beer status, managing tariff cost offsets through pricing and efficiency, and exploring value-accretive portfolio moves.
Key Metrics: Investors track annual beer segment net sales growth, adjusted EPS vs. guidance midpoint, operating margin trends, free cash flow, and volume performance in the Hispanic and broader premium beer consumer segments.
Progress: Q4 FY2026 adjusted EPS of $1.90 beat estimates by ~10%, while Q1 FY2027 consensus stands at $3.26, suggesting sequential recovery, though full-year guidance remains below pre-tariff expectations.
Focus Areas: The call will center on tariff mitigation strategies, Modelo volume trends, pricing power sustainability, any portfolio restructuring updates, and management's confidence in achieving the revised FY2027 EPS range.
Risks Potential: Aluminum tariffs at elevated levels (raised to 50% on canned imports), weakening demand among Hispanic consumers tied to immigration policy uncertainty, and a macro-driven consumer trade-down are the most immediate headwinds.
Concerns: Investors remain worried that STZ's full-year EPS guidance already embeds conservative assumptions that may be further pressured if tariff rates stay elevated or volume trends deteriorate beyond current expectations.
Market Trends: Premium beer remains a bright spot in the broader beverage sector, but STZ's heavy dependence on the Hispanic consumer demographic makes it uniquely exposed to sentiment shifts tied to U.S. immigration and trade policy.
General Mills, Inc. (GIS) – July 1, 2026, Before Market Open
Financial Trends: Full-year FY2026 organic net sales are guided to be flat to down 1%, with adjusted EPS expected 10–15% lower in constant currency, reflecting structural volume declines and the lapping of the U.S. yogurt divestiture.
Strategic Initiatives: General Mills is revitalizing core brands (including a Honey Nut Cheerios Protein relaunch), sharpening its portfolio through divestitures, and investing in pet food and international segments to restore long-term growth.
Key Metrics: Annual organic revenue growth, adjusted EPS vs. consensus of ~$0.80 for the quarter (full-year read-through), segment-level volumes in North America Retail and Pet, and free cash flow are the primary investor benchmarks.
Progress: Q3 FY2026 adjusted EPS of $0.64 missed estimates by 12.1%, revenues fell 8.4% year-over-year, and sales volumes dropped 11% YoY, though the U.S. yogurt divestiture generated a $1.5B gain that temporarily boosted reported operating profit.
Focus Areas: Analysts will probe volume recovery in North America Retail, pet food segment performance, FY2027 organic sales and EPS guidance, and whether cost savings and innovation can offset continued category softness.
Risks Potential: Structural headwinds—including private label competition, consumer trade-down, pricing fatigue across cereal and snacks, and input cost volatility—remain persistent threats to GIS's top-line and margin outlook.
Concerns: After multiple consecutive quarters of EPS misses and double-digit volume declines, the Street is skeptical that brand renovation and portfolio pruning can restore meaningful organic growth within the near-term guidance window.
Market Trends: The packaged food sector is broadly pressured by consumers shifting toward private labels and fresh alternatives, and with GIS's year-to-date stock decline of ~24%, sentiment will hinge on whether FY2027 guidance signals a credible inflection.
Meet Evan Buenger

Evan Buenger, Editor of the Bull and Bear Brief
From a young age, Evan was fascinated by the stock market. At just 11 years old, he received a Wall Street Journal subscription for his birthday, sparking a lifelong passion for investing. Evan spent his formative years studying the strategies and philosophies of legendary investors like Paul Tudor Jones, Stanley Druckenmiller, and George Soros, absorbing their wisdom and developing his own unique approach to the markets.
As Evan's knowledge grew, he began to incorporate the time-tested, technically-based strategies of trading legends like William O'Neil and Richard Wyckoff into his own investment framework. By borrowing elements from each and rigorously testing them in real-time, Evan created a powerful conglomerate strategy that encompasses fundamentals, technicals, and macroeconomics.
Today, Evan is a professional trader and was a top contender in the 2020 US Investing Championship. His extraordinary performance, with a 141.8% return, is a testament to his studious background, well-informed approach, and unwavering dedication to his craft.
At the core of Evan's strategy is identifying stocks that benefit from sector trends and rotation. By combining fundamental analysis with a focus on relative strength and advanced technical analysis techniques, Evan is able to identify the stocks that are most likely to move higher or lower over the intermediate term.
While he keeps a close eye on macroeconomic trends, his willingness to adapt to changing market conditions, as well as his developed ability to know when to and not to act in a fast-moving market, is what sets him apart. Evan has consistently demonstrated his ability to navigate even the most challenging investment environments. His impressive track record and unique perspective make him a valuable voice in the world of finance, and he is thrilled to have the opportunity to share his insights and expertise with subscribers of the Bull and Bear Brief.
Subscribe to Stock Portfolio Recommendations Newsletter to read the rest.
Become a paying subscriber of the Bull and Bear Brief: Stock Portfolio Recommendations Newsletter to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.
Upgrade to Stock Portfolio Recommendations NewsletterA subscription gets you:
- Expert-curated stock trades delivered weekly to strategically build your wealth-generating portfolio
- Real-time position management with timely alerts on existing holdings—ensuring you capture profits and minimize losses with precision timing
- Monthly Q&A where we address paid subscriber questions, examine real-world scenarios, and discuss current market conditions
- Regular reviews of both successful and unsuccessful trade recommendations, analyzing what worked, what didn't, and the lessons we can extract





























